Archive | Technology

Tags:

10 iPhone Apps For Keeping Your New Year’s Resolutions

Posted on 28 February 2010 by Michael

Everyone loves a new year. It’s a fresh start, full of promise that this will be the year you get fit, budget better, organize your life, and help others. Just like last year. And the year before that.

So how can you ensure that your resolutions last past January? Well, you won’t be surprised to find out, there’s an app for that. Here are 10 great iPhone apps to help you stay true to your New Year’s resolutions.

Note: Many of these apps are on sale for the New Year holiday.

Lose Weight and Get Fit


1. DailyBurn

This app does everything but burn the calories for you. Enter your current weight and goal weight, and it’ll tell you how many calories you should eat a day and show your progress. You can even input in what foods you eat, and the comprehensive database will tell you the calorie count. Keeping track of everything you eat may seem a little OCD, but studies have shown that food diaries help with weight loss. If you want to make this process easier you can buy their companion app, Food Scanner ($2.99), that allows you to scan UPC codes of store-bought food to keep track of calorie and nutrition info. Oh, and everything syncs to dailyburn.com. What are you waiting for?

Cost: Free


2. iFitness

iFitness is the best fitness app out there right now. It has over 230 different individual exercises to choose from. For each exercise you’ll see a picture, a description, and, for most, a video as well. You can even choose exercises based on muscle group. This app is great for everyone from the beginner who’s looking for an easy-to-follow workout, to the advanced body builder who wants a custom way to track progress.

Cost: $2.99


Save Money


3. Mint.com

Mint (Mint) somehow makes budgeting fun (or as close to fun as possible) with it’s slick interface and color coded graphs and charts. The iPhone app allows you to check in with your account on the go. You can see alerts (“You’ve spent too much on parking!”) and take a quick look at your budgetary goals, which may be just the thing to prevent that impulse buy, or remind you that $4 lattes add up really fast.

Cost: Free


4. BillMinder

If you’ve ever paid a bill late, this is the app for you. Enter all your upcoming bills and BillMinder will keep track of when they’re due and whether they’re auto-paid or not. If a due date is coming up, it’ll send you a push notification. They have a free version, Bill Minder Lite, you can try as well (it limits the number of bills you can input).

Cost: $1.99


Get Organized


5. 43Things.com

This app is made for sticking to life goals and New Year’s resolutions, so it was a no-brainer for this list. In it you can keep track of up to 43 “things” that you’d like to accomplish, write notes about each goal, and indicate what percentage of the way you are towards finishing it. It also syncs with their online community 43things.com, which has a cool feature that shows you the goals others are trying to accomplish — just the thing to inspire you to set goals of your own.

Cost: Free


6. Remember the Milk (Remember The Milk (RTM))

Remember the Milk has got a lot of things going for it. Aside from it’s catchy name and cute cow mascot, it’s a great simple to-do list and task manager. It’ll send you push notifications when your task is due and allows you to categorize tasks with multiple lists. You can also sync with the Remember the Milk web app, Google Calendar, and Google (Google) tasks. Adding tasks is easy, and you can even add them via e-mail as well as share them with others. However, you might spend so much time getting your tasks organized, you run out of time to actually get them done.

Cost: 15 day free trial and then $25/year subscription


Learn Something New


7. Human Japanese

Everyone always says they want to learn another language. Well, stop waiting and get an iPhone app to actually do it. Human Japanese is an amazing app that lets you learn the language from square one. If you’re interested in learning other languages, check out Basic Spanish for Dummies ($0.99), Pocket Italian – Beginner ($4.99), or FREE French Essentials by AccelaStudy (Free). The iPhone has apps to help you learn just about any language you’d want to.

Cost: $9.99


8. Star Walk

Maybe this is just one of my personal goals, but I’ve always wanted to know more constellations (other than the big dipper). This app feels like stargazing with my own personal astronomer. Hold the app up to the sky and it’ll show you what constellations you’re looking at. You can even use it in the daytime to see what the night sky would look like. And it has more info than I’ll ever find time to absorb.

Cost: $2.99


Go Green


9. Good Guide

Let’s say one of your goals is that you’d like to make a difference. You walk into the grocery store and try to figure out what to buy, but you can’t tell which products are the most “green.” Are any of them actually better for the environment? Are they worth the extra price? Use Good Guide’s comprehensive database to figure out which products are best for your health, the environment, and society. This app even has a barcode scanner so you can quickly check out products before you buy them. Also, each product has not only a rating but a breakdown of why they were given that rating so you can make your own judgments.

Cost: Free


10. A Real Tree

Much as the name implies, this app plants a real tree in one of twelve countries facing deforestation. Lest you get confused (like some of the app’s reviewers) the point is not the the app itself, which simply shows a growing tree animation. Instead it’s created to give iPhone users an easy way to donate, simply by buying the app. If you’d like to learn more check out Mokugift. Their site allows you to virtually gift a tree to a friend.

Cost: $0.99

Source: mashable.com

Comments (0)

Tags:

Computer Virus Creator Jailed As ‘Global Menace’

Posted on 27 February 2010 by Michael

An unemployed warehouseman from a seaside resort in north Wales was yesterday jailed for creating computer viruses with the potential to wreak havoc across the globe.

Simon Vallor, 22, was told that he was one of a new breed of criminal whose ingenuity allowed him to cause worldwide disruption on an “unimaginable scale”.

Vallor’s viruses, which he created on three computers in the bedroom of his family’s pebbledash home in Llandudno, hit tens of thousands of computers in 46 countries.

Had he not been stopped by Scotland Yard’s computer crime unit and the FBI, many more companies, organisations and individuals could have suffered, Southwark crown court, London, was told.

Vallor, who was jailed for two years, is only the second British man to be imprisoned for creating computer viruses.

The industry, which often accuses the courts of not taking the offence seriously enough, welcomed the sentencing.

Vallor’s three viruses, GoKar, Redesi-B and Admirer, were spotted on the internet in December 2001 by the FBI’s Newark field office.

Federal agents linked the viruses to someone who used the nickname Gobo and traced him to Britain. Scotland Yard’s computer crime unit was then alerted.

GoKar was Vallor’s most prolific virus. It appeared as an email on an user’s computer with an “intriguing” single line of text such as: “If I were God and I didn’t believe in myself would it be blasphemy.”

When the email was opened the body of the text contained another apparently innocuous, if puzzling, message such as: “They say love is blind” or “Happy birthday, mine not yours.”

Unbeknown to the user, the virus automatically sent itself off to every contact in the user’s address book.

One anti-virus filter service alone stopped it 33,000 times. It had the potential to clog company computers and even force them to shut down email systems.

Scotland Yard claims that at one point GoKar was rated the third most prevalent virus of all time. But Vallor’s other viruses, Redesi-B and Admirer, had the potential to be far more destructive.

Like GoKar, they looked like ordinary emails, again with inviting message lines.

Redesi-B purported to be a security update from one of the computer giants. The user was then invited to open an application that would help make their machine more secure. But, once this application was opened, it planted a virus in the computer with a delay mechanism.

After a certain period, the virus wiped off all material from the computer’s hard disk. All the user would be left with was the message: “Bide ye the Wiccan laws ye must, in perfect love and perfect trust.” Wiccan is a pagan religion that Vallor has claimed he has connections with.

The Admirer virus, which tempted users with messages such as “Secret admirer” and “Happy Valentine’s Day”, could also destroy material that had not previously been saved.

Ironically, the police raided Vallor’s home, where he lives with his father and brother, on Valentine’s Day. Vallor was in bed at the time.

Before his jailing, he said: “It was totally mind-blowing. One minute you’re asleep, the next you’ve got Scotland Yard in your bedroom.”

The police had taken about three weeks to trace him via his BT internet account. He told police his motivation was simply to see if he could do it.

In court his counsel, Grant Vanstone, depicted him as an “unremarkable young man” who left school with four GCSEs and worked for a time in a warehouse.

After his mother died during a holiday with relatives in 2000 he lost his job and became introverted and obsessed with computers.

He began writing GoKar on his birthday in 2001 because he was “feeling sorry for himself”. Mr Vanstone said: “He was shocked when it spread as it did.”

But after his arrest he did not appear contrite on his website, the Devil Within.

He wrote: “I caused no harm, endangered no one, hurt no one, damaged nothing yet I may very well be going to prison, while there are drink-drivers, rapists, even murderers who get let off.”

The judge, Geoffrey Rivlin QC, made it clear that Vallor’s sentence should be heeded as a warning by other virus writers. “People who commit offences such as this are not just boffins or nerds sitting alone with their computers,” he said.

“They also happen to be criminals who are difficult to detect and have the capacity to cause disruption, consternation and even economic loss on an unimaginable scale.

“So many people rely on computers that any interference with that use must be regarded as a very serious matter.” It was a crime, he said, which “cries out for a deterrent sentence”.

Source: Guardian.co.uk

Comments (0)

Computer Virus Can Cause Hard Drive Crashes

Posted on 27 February 2010 by Michael

Q Is it possible to prevent a hard drive crash?

AHard drives, being motorized mechanical objects, eventually fail. But there are some basic things you can do to keep them in better working condition.

For one, treat it gently, especially when the computer is running. Sudden bangs, bumps and drops can cause the reading and writing heads inside the drive to crash, which can destroy data and make the drive inoperable.

Computer viruses can also crash hard drives. In addition to anti-virus software, there are disk maintenance programs to inspect and repair the drive. Most operating systems include these tools, like the Check Disk program in Windows and Disk Utility in Mac OS X; third-party software is also available.

Internal computer components, including hard drives, are susceptible to heat. Make sure the vents around the computer are not blocked, allowing air to circulate, and see that the fan is running. A fan that isn’t working or that is making strange noises could lead to an overheated machine that shuts down unexpectedly, or worse.

Listening to the computer carefully can also alert you to potential problems. Clicking and grinding noises coming from the hard drive often means it is headed for failure and it is time to back up those important files. In fact, the best defense against hard drive failure is backing up your data regularly.

Q Can you get a computer virus from Facebook?

A Social networking sites are not immune to malicious software attacks, so picking up a virus is a possibility, especially if you are using Windows. For example, variations of the virus called Koobface have been plaguing Facebook and MySpace since August.

A common ploy for the virus is to send messages from a compromised account to all the people on the person’s Friends list, inviting them to click on a link for a video. (As with regular e-mail, suspicious links — even from friends — should be avoided.)

The link leads to a Web page that appears to show a video. The page then downloads the virus file to the computer, using an innocuous file name such as “Flash update.” (Flash, the multimedia software by Adobe, is used on many video-sharing sites like YouTube.)

The virus often includes a program to steal passwords or join the infected machine to a botnet — a vast network of compromised computers intended to pump out spam and viruses around the Internet without their owners’ knowledge.

Once a computer is infected, the virus can spread throughout another friend’s list of friends to get more victims. McAfee Security has an illustrated description of the Koobface virus on its site at snipurl.com/75hgq. Symantec, another anti-virus software maker, has information on its site as well, at snipurl.com/75hzl.

Most up-to-date anti-virus programs should be able to fend off Koobface and similar threats. Some companies are selling software specifically to protect against botnets, like Symantec’s $30 Norton AntiBot program for Windows (symantec.com/norton/antibot).

Source: Telegram.com

Comments (0)

Tags:

Finally, Final Fantasy Is Coming To iPhone

Posted on 23 January 2010 by Michael

The iPhone (and iPod touch) is lately becoming the mobile platform of choice for the classic games connoisseur. Yesterday we wrote about Ultimate Genesis, the official Sega Genesis emulator for the iPhone and iPod touch, and today Kotaku reports that legendary games Final Fantasy I & II will soon be available on these platforms, too.

Details are scarce, both in terms of availability date and the price, as publisher Square Enix simply lists both games as TBA, but they’re coming, and that’s enough to lift the spirits of every true gaming geek. Check out some more images below.

Source: Mashable.com

Comments (0)

Tags:

Google Wave To Be Released To 100,000 Testers Wednesday

Posted on 29 September 2009 by Michael

(CNN) — Google Wave, a product that promises to revolutionize online communication, will go out to about 100,000 beta testers Wednesday.

The Web application from Google Inc. combines elements of e-mail, chat, Wiki documents, blogs and photo-sharing sites to create a form of Internet communication called a “hosted conversation,” or a “wave.”

Google demonstrated Wave at the Google I/O developer conference in San Francisco, California, in May. The closed group of beta testers will help Google fish bugs out of the application before a public release by the end of the year, according to the Google Wave Web site.

The app was created by Jens and Lars Rasmussen, the Australian brothers who developed Google Maps. The Rasmussen brothers said they hope Google Wave will eventually replace e-mail as the main way people converse on the Internet.

“This should be something everybody uses and something everybody knows,” Jens Rasmussen said.

In Wave, e-mail-like communications can be edited by several users simultaneously. And users can chat about certain sections of Wave documents in real time, where all users see what a person is typing as it is typed. If a person comes to the conversation late, they can replay everything they’ve missed.

The Rasmussens hope these functions will make online communication more efficient and collaborative.

Jens Rasmussen said e-mail is a computer version of snail mail. Wave will be something new, a real-time communication system designed specifically for today’s faster-paced, multitasking Internet, he said.

“We really have a much too strong tendency to just take things we know and just adapt them to the digital world,” he said.

Tech bloggers have largely cheered the release of the product. But there are some concerns that the app may be too complicated for mainstream Web users.

In a video demonstration, the Rasmussens spend an hour and 20 minutes explaining Wave.

Initial reviews of Wave also noted a number of glitches in the application.

Ben Parr of the social-media blog Mashable writes that Wave still has bugs but that the product is improving over time.

“As an initial user of Wave, I have to tell you: things have gotten much more stable. It still has a slow response time in certain situations and it can still crash, but these things happen far less often than they used to,” he writes.

The blog TechCrunch wrote that Wave “drips with ambition” and will be “a new communication platform for a new Web.”

“Wave offers a very sleek and easy way to navigate and participate in communication on the Web that makes both email and instant messaging look stale,” TechCrunch’s MG Siegler wrote.

Source: cnn.com

Comments (1)

Tags:

Nintendo Slashes Wii Price By 20% – Now Only $199.99

Posted on 28 September 2009 by Michael

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — Nintendo said it is cutting the price of its popular Wii video-game console by $50 to $199.99.

The 20% price drop on the Wii, which features a motion-sensor remote, will take effect Sunday, according to a Nintendo statement released early Thursday.

The new price is the first reduction since the console launched in November 2006.

The interactive Wii immediately proved wildly popular across demographics — including rehabilitation centers, to aid patients’ recovery — and demand for the console outstripped supply more than a year after its initial release in November 2006.

Earlier this year, Nintendo Chief Executive Satoru Iwata said the company had sold 50 million Wii units.

The company said in a statement Thursday that it hoped the new price would attract consumers who were on the cusp of becoming gamers. According to its own research, Nintendo said there are about 50 million Americans who fall into that category.

Nintendo’s price cut mirrors recent moves by two rivals. In August, Microsoft (MSFT, Fortune 500) slashed the price of its high-end Xbox 360 “Elite” model by $100 — just days after Sony (SNE) cut its console PlayStation 3 by the same amount.
‘It’s-a me, Mario’

In its statement, Nintendo also confirmed the release date of “the first truly multiplayer” game in its ever-popular “Mario Brothers” series.

The “New Super Mario Bros.” for Wii will hit stores Nov. 15. It’s the first title in the classic series that allows four users to play the game at the same time.

Customers can try this and other games at a “sampling tour” coming to three cities in October.

“Differentiating between thousands of [game] alternatives is nearly impossible,” said Nintendo in a statement, adding that the ideal solution is allowing consumers to test drive the games before they plunk down cash for a game or system.

Users will be able to try out one of several Wii games, including “Sports Resort” and “Wii Fit Plus,” as well as DS titles like “The Legend of Zelda: Spirit Tracks.”

The tour will come to Long Beach, Calif., Oct. 2-4; to Philadelphia Oct. 9-11; and end in New York City Oct. 16-18.

Source: money.cnn.com

Comments (0)

10 Useful Usability Findings and Guidelines

Posted on 26 September 2009 by Michael

Everyone would agree that usability is an important aspect of Web design. Whether you’re working on a portfolio website, online store or Web app, making your pages easy and enjoyable for your visitors to use is key. Many studies have been done over the years on various aspects of Web and interface design, and the findings are valuable in helping us improve our work. Here are 10 useful usability findings and guidelines that may help you improve the user experience on your websites.

Form Labels Work Best Above The Field

A study by UX Matters found that the ideal position for labels in forms is above the fields. On many forms, labels are put to the left of the fields, creating a two-column layout; while this looks good, it’s not the easiest layout to use. Why is that? Because forms are generally vertically oriented; i.e. users fill the form from top to bottom. Users scan the form downwards as they go along. And following the label to the field below is easier than finding the field to the right of the label.

tumblr

Tumblr features a simple and elegant sign-up form that adheres to UX Matter’s recommendation.

Positioning labels on the left also poses another problem: do you left-align or right-align the labels? Left-aligning makes the form scannable but disconnects the labels from the fields, making it difficult to see which label applies to which field. Right-aligning does the reverses: it makes for a good-looking but less scannable form. Labels above fields work best in most circumstances. The study also found that labels should not be bold, although this recommendation is not conclusive.

Users Focus On Faces

People instinctively notice other people right away when they come into view. On Web pages, we tend to focus on people’s faces and eyes, which gives marketers a good technique for attracting attention. But our attraction to people’s faces and eyes is only the beginning; it turns out we actually glance in the direction the person in the image is looking in.

eyes1

Eye-tracking heat map of a baby looking directly at us, from the UsableWorld study.
eyes2

And now the baby is looking at the content. Notice the increase in people looking at the headline and text.

Here’s an eye-tracking study that demonstrates this. We’re instinctively drawn to faces, but if that face is looking somewhere other than at us, we’ll also look in that direction. Take advantage of this phenomenon by drawing your users’ attention to the most important parts of your page or ad.

Quality Of Design Is An Indicator Of Credibility

Various studies have been conducted to find out just what influences people’s perception of a website’s credibility:

fever

We don’t know if Fever app is any good, but the sleek user interface and website make a great first impression.

One interesting finding of these studies is that users really do judge a book by its cover… or rather, a website by its design. Elements such as layout, consistency, typography, color and style all affect how users perceive your website and what kind of image you project. Your website should project not only a good image but also the right one for your audience.

Other factors that influence credibility are: the quality of the website’s content, amount of errors, rate of updates, ease of use and trustworthiness of authors.

Most Users Do Not Scroll

Jakob Nielsen’s study on how much users scroll (in Prioritizing Web Usability) revealed that only 23% of visitors scroll on their first visit to a website. This means that 77% of visitors won’t scroll; they’ll just view the content above the fold (i.e. the area of the page that is visible on the screen without scrolling down). What’s more, the percentage of users who scroll decreases with subsequent visits, with only 16% scrolling on their second visit. This data highlights just how important it is to place your key content on a prominent position, especially on landing pages.

This doesn’t mean you should cram everything in the upper area of the page, just that you should make the best use of that area. Crowding it with content will just make the content inaccessible; when the user sees too much information, they don’t know where to begin looking.

basecamp

Basecamp makes great use of space. Above the fold (768 pixels high), it shows a large screenshot, tagline, value proposition, call to action, client list, videos and short feature list with images.

This is most important for the home page, where most new visitors will land. So provide the core essentials there:

  1. Name of the website,
  2. Value proposition of the website (i.e. what benefit users will get from using it),
  3. Navigation for the main sections of the website that are relevant to the user.

However, users’ habits have significantly changed since then. Recent studies prove that users are quite comfortable with scrolling and in some situations they are willing to scroll to the bottom of the page. Many users are more comfortable with scrolling than with a pagination, and for many users the most important information of the page isn’t necessarily placed “above the fold” (which is because of the variety of available display resolutions a quite outdated, deprecated term). So it is a good idea to divide your layout into sections for easy scanning, separating them with a lot of white space.

For further information please take a look at the articles Unfolding the fold (Clicktale), Paging VS Scrolling (Wichita University – SURL), Blasting the Myth of the Fold (Boxes and Arrows). (thanks, Fred Leuck).

Blue Is The Best Color For Links

While giving your website a unique design is great, when it comes to usability, doing what everyone else is doing is best. Follow conventions, because when people visit a new website, the first place they look for things are in the places where they found them on most other websites; they tap into their experience to make sense of this new content. This is known as usage patterns. People expect certain things to be the same, such as link colors, the location of the website’s logo, the behavior of tabbed navigation and so on.

google2

Google keeps all links on its websites blue for a reason: the color is familiar to most users, which makes it easy to locate.

What color should your links be? The first consideration is contrast: links have to be dark (or light) enough to contrast with the background color. Secondly, they should stand out from the color of the rest of the text; so, no black links with black text. And finally, research shows (Van Schaik and Ling) that if usability if your priority, sticking to blue for links is best. The browser’s default link color is blue, so people expect it. Choosing a different color is by no means a problem, but it may affect the speed with which users find it.

The Ideal Search Box Is 27-Characters Wide

What’s the ideal width of a search box? Is there such a thing? Jakob Nielsen performed a usability study on the length of search queries in website search boxes (Prioritizing Web Usability). It turns out that most of today’s search boxes are too short. The problem with short boxes is that even though you can type out a long query, only a portion of the text will be visible at a time, making it difficult to review or edit what you’ve typed.

The study found that the average search box is 18-characters wide. The data showed that 27% of queries were too long to fit into it. Extending the box to 27 characters would accommodate 90% of queries. Remember, you can set widths using ems, not just pixels and points. One em is the width and height of one “m” character (using whatever font size a website is set to). So, use this measure to scale the width of the text input field to 27-characters wide.

apple2

Apple’s search box is a little too short, cutting off the query, “Microsoft Office 2008.”

In general, search boxes are better too wide than too short, so that users can quickly review, verify and submit the query. This guideline is very simple but unfortunately too often dismissed or ignored. Some padding in the input field can also improve the design and user experience.

White Space Improves Comprehension

Most designers know the value of white space, which is the empty space between paragraphs, pictures, buttons and other items on the page. White space de-clutters a page by giving items room to breathe. We can also group items together by decreasing the space between them and increasing the space between them and other items on the page. This is important for showing relationships between items (e.g. showing that this button applies to this set of items) and building a hierarchy of elements on the page.

netsetter

Notice the big content margin, padding and paragraph spacing on The Netsetter. All that space makes the content easy and comfortable to read.

White space also makes content more readable. A study (Lin, 2004) found that good use of white space between paragraphs and in the left and right margins increases comprehension by almost 20%. Readers find it easier to focus on and process generously spaced content.

In fact, according to Chaperro, Shaikh and Baker, the layout on a Web page (including white space, headers, indentation and figures) may not measurably influence performance but does influence user satisfaction and experience.

Effective User Testing Doesn’t Have To Be Extensive

Jakob Nielsen’s study on the ideal number of test subjects in usability tests found that tests with just five users would reveal about 85% of all problems with your website, whereas 15 users would find pretty much all problems.

usertests

Source: Jakob Nielsen’s AlertBox

The biggest issues are usually discovered by the first one or two users, and the following testers confirm these issues and discover the remaining minor issues. Only two test users would likely find half the problems on your website. This means that testing doesn’t have to be extensive or expensive to yield good results. The biggest gains are achieved when going from 0 test users to 1, so don’t be afraid of doing too little: any testing is better than none.

Informative Product Pages Help You Stand Out

If your website has product pages, people shopping online will definitely look through them. But many product pages lack sufficient information, even for visitors doing a quick scan. This is a serious problem, because product information helps people make purchasing decision. Research shows that poor product information accounts for around 8% of usability problems and even 10% of user failure (i.e. the user gives up and leaves the website) (Prioritizing Web Usability).

ipod

Apple provides separate “Tech Specs” pages for its products, which keeps complicated details away from the simpler marketing pages, yet provides easy access when they’re needed.

Provide detailed information about your products, but don’t fall into the trap of bombarding users with too much text. Make the information easy to digest. Make the page scannable by breaking up the text into smaller segments and using plenty of sub-headings. Add plenty of images for your products, and use the right language: don’t use jargon that your visitors might not understand.

Most Users Are Blind To Advertising

Jakob Nielsen reports in his AlertBox entry that most users are essentially blind to ad banners. If they’re looking for a snippet of information on a page or are engrossed in content, they won’t be distracted by the ads on the side.

The implication of this is not only that users will avoid ads but that they’ll avoid anything that looks like an ad, even if it’s not an ad. Some heavily styled navigation items may look like banners, so be careful with these elements.

flashden

The square banners on the left sidebar of FlashDen are actually not ads: they’re content links. They do look uncomfortably close to ad banners and so may be overlooked by some users.

That said, ads that look like content will get people looking and clicking. This may generate more ad revenue but comes at the cost of your users’ trust, as they click on things they thought were genuine content. Before you go down that path, consider the trade-off: short-term revenue versus long-term trust.

Bonus: Findings From Our Case-Studies

In recent years, Smashing Magazine’s editorial team has conducted a number of case studies in an attempt to identify common design solutions and practices. So far, we have analyzed Web forms, blogs, typography and portfolios; and more case studies will be published next month. We have found some interesting patterns that could serve as guidelines for your next design.

Here, we’ll review some of the practices and design patterns that we discovered in our case studies in this brief, compact overview, for your convenience.

According to our typography study:

  • Line height (in pixels) ÷ body copy font size (in pixels) = 1.48
    1.5 is commonly recommended in classic typographic books, so our study backs up this rule of thumb. Very few websites use anything less than this. And the number of websites that go over 1.48 decreases as you get further from this value.
  • Line length (pixels) ÷ line height (pixels) = 27.8
    The average line length is 538.64 pixels (excluding margins and padding), which is pretty large considering that many websites still have body copy that is 12 to 13 pixels in font size.
  • Space between paragraphs (pixels) ÷ line height (pixels) = 0.754
    It turns out that paragraph spacing (i.e. the space between the last line of one paragraph and the first line of the next) rarely equals the leading (which would be the main characteristic of perfect vertical rhythm). More often, paragraph spacing is just 75% of paragraph leading. The reason may be that leading usually includes the space taken up by descenders; and because most characters do not have descenders, additional white space is created under the line.
  • Optimal number of characters per line is 55 to 75
    According to classic typographic books, the optimal number of characters per line is between 55 and 75, but between 75 and 85 characters per line is more popular in practice.

According to our blog design study:

  • Layouts usually have a fixed width (pixel-based) (92%) and are usually centered (94%). The width of fixed layouts varies between 951 and 1000 pixels (56%).
  • The home page shows excerpts of 10 to 20 posts (62%).
  • 58% of a website’s overall layout is used to display the main content.

According to our Web form design study:

  • The registration link is titled “sign up” (40%) and is placed in the upper-right corner.
  • Sign-up forms have simple layouts, to avoid distracting users (61%).
  • Titles of input fields are bolded (62%), and fields are vertically arranged more than they are horizontally arranged (86%).
  • Designers tend to include few mandatory fields and few optional fields.
  • Email confirmation is not given (82%), but password confirmation is (72%).
  • The “Submit” button is either left-aligned (56%) or centered (26%).

According to our portfolio design study:

  • 89% of layouts are horizontally centered, and most of them have a large horizontal navigation menu.
  • 47.2% of portfolios have a client page, and 67.2% have some form of standalone services page.
  • 63.6% have a detailed page for every project, including case studies, testimonials, slideshows with screenshots, drafts and sketches.
  • Contact pages contain driving directions, phone number, email address, postal address, vCard and online form

Source: smashingmagazine.com

Comments (1)

Tags:

Gmail Service Goes Down Again For The Second Time In A Few Weeks

Posted on 24 September 2009 by Michael

The popular Web-based e-mail service from Google Inc. has crashed several times in recent months. That’s led to a bit of anger, and sarcastic sighs of despair, on tech blogs and on the micro-blogging site Twitter.

Google posted a note Thursday morning saying it is aware that some people are experiencing an e-mail outage. The Mountain View, California, company did not offer an explanation in the post or immediately return a request for comment.

“We’re aware of a problem with Google Mail affecting a small subset of users. The affected users are unable to access Google Mail, but we’ve provided a workaround below,” the company wrote on its apps dashboard.

Google says people who have signed up for a service to run Gmail off of their computer hard drives, instead of the Web, should be able to use the service through the crash.

Google’s post says the company will release more details about the partial crash later Thursday.

Gmail lets Internet users write e-mail messages, archive documents, chat online and store contact lists. Millions of people around the world use the free service.

As with previous outages, the online community is complaining the service break disrupts office work and personal lives. As more computing power moves “into the cloud,” storing information online rather than on home computers, online applications like Gmail become important parts of people’s lives.

The most recent Gmail outage occurred September 1. Some tech writers seemed genuinely disturbed by the crash. Others mocked how addicted some people have become to online-only forms of communication.

Mashable, a blog that covers social media, posted a list of five things to do while Gmail is down.

One of the recommendations:

“Go outside! There’s nothing left for it. Our cozy technosphere bubble has been burst by this point. Go look for someone to harass on the street in person and ask them what URL shortener they use.”

Another recent Gmail crash occurred in February.

At the time, blogger Ron Schenone wrote that people put a lot of faith in big tech companies like Google.

“It seems to me that people want to believe that Google is infallible,” he wrote on the Lockergnome blog network. “Though Google may be the king of search, their equipment is man made and their technicians are human.”

Source: Cnn.com

Comments (0)

Tags:

Could Moon Landings Have Been Faked? Some Still Think So

Posted on 17 July 2009 by Michael

(CNN) — It captivated millions of people around the world for eight days in the summer of 1969. It brought glory to the embattled U.S. space program and inspired beliefs that anything was possible.

It’s arguably the greatest technological feat of the 20th century.

And to some, it was all a lie.

Forty years after Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin set foot on the moon, a small cult of conspiracy theorists maintains the historic event — and the five subsequent Apollo moon landings — were staged. These people believe NASA fabricated the landings to trump their Soviet rivals and fulfill President Kennedy’s goal of ferrying humans safely to and from the moon by the end of the 1960s.

“I do know the moon landings were faked,” said crusading filmmaker Bart Sibrel, whose aggressive interview tactics once provoked Aldrin to punch him in the face. “I’d bet my life on it.”

Sibrel may seem crazy, but he has company. A 1999 Gallup poll found that a scant 6 percent of Americans doubted the Apollo 11 moon landing happened, and there is anecdotal evidence that the ranks of such conspiracy theorists, fueled by innuendo-filled documentaries and the Internet, are growing.

Twenty-five percent of respondents to a survey in the British magazine Engineering & Technology said they do not believe humans landed on the moon. A handful of Web sites and blogs circulate suspicions about NASA’s “hoax.”

And a Google search this week for “Apollo moon landing hoax” yielded more than 1.5 billion results.

“We love conspiracies,” said Roger Launius, a senior curator at the National Air and Space Museum in Washington. “Going to the moon is hard to understand. And it’s easier for some people to accept the answer that, ‘Well, maybe we didn’t go to the moon.’ A lot of it is naivete.”

Conspiracy theories about the Apollo missions began not long after the last astronaut returned from the moon in 1972. Bill Kaysing, a technical writer for Rocketdyne, which built rocket engines for NASA’s Apollo program, published a 1974 book, “We Never Went to the Moon: America’s Thirty Billion Dollar Swindle.”

In the book and elsewhere, Kaysing argued that NASA lacked the technology in 1969 to land humans safely on the moon, that the Apollo astronauts would have been poisoned by passing through the Van Allen radiation belts that ring the Earth and that NASA’s photos from the moon contained suspicious anomalies. Video See improved NASA footage of the 1969 moonwalk »

Kaysing theorized NASA sent the Apollo 11 astronauts up in a rocket until it was out of sight, then transferred the lunar capsule and its three passengers to a military cargo plane that dropped the capsule eight days later in the Pacific, where it was recovered. In the meantime, he believed, NASA officials filmed the “moon landing” at Area 51, the high-security military base in the Nevada desert, and brainwashed the astronauts to ensure their cooperation.

Some believe Kaysing’s theories inspired the 1978 movie “Capricorn One,” in which NASA fakes a Mars landing on a remote military base, then goes to desperate lengths to cover it up. Others insist NASA recruited director Stanley Kubrick, hot off “2001: A Space Odyssey,” to film the “faked” moon landings.

Oh, and those moon rocks? Lunar meteorites from Antarctica.

Decades later, Kaysing’s beliefs formed the foundation for “Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon?” a sensational 2001 Fox TV documentary that spotted eerie “inconsistencies” in NASA’s Apollo images and TV footage.

Among them: no blast craters are visible under the landing modules; shadows intersect instead of running parallel, suggesting the presence of an unnatural light source; and a planted American flag appears to ripple in a breeze although there’s no wind on the moon.

The hour-long special sparked such interest in the topic that NASA took the unusual step of issuing a news release and posting a point-by-point rebuttal on its Web site. The press release began: “Yes. Astronauts did land on the moon.”

In various documents, NASA has countered that the Apollo astronauts passed through the Van Allen belts too quickly to be exposed to dangerous levels of radiation; that the module’s descent engines weren’t powerful enough to leave a blast crater; that the shadows in photos were distorted by wide-angle lenses and sloping lunar terrain; and that the Apollo flags had horizontal support bars that made the flags swing.

Kaysing died in 2005, but not before grabbing the attention of Sibrel, a Nashville, Tennessee, filmmaker who has since become the most visible proponent of the Apollo hoax theories. With funding from an anonymous donor, Sibrel wrote and directed a 47-minute documentary in 2001 that reiterated many of the now-familiar hoax arguments.

Critics of moon-landing hoax theorists, and there are many, say it would be impossible for tens of thousands of NASA employees and Apollo contractors to keep such a whopping secret for almost four decades.

But Sibrel believes the Apollo program was so compartmentalized that only its astronauts and a handful of high-level NASA officials knew the entire story. Sibrel spent years ambushing Apollo astronauts and insisting they swear on a Bible before his cameras that they walked on the moon.

“When someone has gotten away with a crime, in my opinion, they deserve to be ambushed,” Sibrel said. “I’m a journalist trying to get at the truth.”

In an episode made infamous on YouTube, Sibrel confronted Aldrin in 2002 and called him “a coward, a liar and a thief.” Aldrin, then 72, socked the thirtysomething Sibrel in the face, knocking him backwards.

“I don’t want to call attention to the individuals who are trying to promote and shuffle off this hoax on people,” Aldrin told CNN in a recent interview. “I feel sorry for the gullible people who’re going to go along with them. I guess it’s just natural human reaction to want to be a part of ‘knowing something that somebody doesn’t know.’ But it’s misguided. It’s just a shame.”

It’s been 37 years since the last Apollo moon mission, and tens of millions of younger Americans have no memories of watching the moon landings live. A 2005-2006 poll by Mary Lynne Dittmar, a space consultant based in Houston, Texas, found that more than a quarter of Americans 18 to 25 expressed some doubt that humans set foot on the moon.

“As the number of people who were not yet born at the time of the Apollo program increases, the number of questions [about the moon landings] also may increase,” NASA said in a statement. “Conspiracy theories are always difficult to refute because of the impossibility of proving a negative.”

Launius, the National Air and Space Museum curator, believes Apollo conspiracy theories resonate with people who are disengaged from society and distrustful of government. He also believes their numbers are overblown.

“These diehards are really vocal, but they’re really tiny,” he said.

But Stuart Robbins, a Ph.D. candidate in astrophysics at the University of Colorado who gives lectures defending NASA from Apollo hoax theorists, believes their influence can be harmful.

“If people don’t think we were able to go to the moon, then they don’t believe in the ingenuity of human achievement,” he said. “Going to the moon and returning astronauts safely back to Earth is arguably one of the most profound achievements in human history, and so when people simply believe it was a hoax, they lose out on that shared experience and doubt what humans can do.”

In its information campaign against Apollo’s “debunkers,” NASA may have a potent ace up its sleeve, however. Its Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter is now circling the moon with powerful cameras, snapping crisp pictures that could reveal Apollo 11’s Eagle lander squatting on the moon’s surface.

Then again, conspiracy theorists may just say NASA doctored the photos.

“Will the LRO’s incredibly high-resolution images of the lunar surface, including, eventually, the Apollo landing sites, finally quell the lunacy of the Moon Hoax believers? Obviously it won’t,” writes astronomer Phil Plait in his blog on Discover magazine’s Web site. “These true believers don’t live in an evidence-based world.”

Source: Cnn.com

Comments (0)

Tags:

Acer Aspire One 10.1″ LCD 1.6GHz Netbook

Posted on 09 July 2009 by Michael

Revenge of the Little People

Probably you don’t think a lot about how challenging the world can be for little people. That’s because the chances are you aren’t one.

Most people are not little people, or they wouldn’t be called that. They’d be called “regular-sized people,” and a person your size would be called a “huge, horrible giganto-man.” Although not to your face, since you could crush a little regular-sized person with your colossal, meaty fist.

You once were a little person, though—one of a very common type of little person that we call “children.” Do you remember? Everything was built too big for you, and you couldn’t reach the freezer without standing on a chair, and you had to wear unfashionable clothes, because no designer makes “skinny jeans” for three-year-olds. And what about leisure time? Did they have clubs your size at the driving range? Negative. Did you ever feel like bellying up to the bar at your local public house. Sorry, you had to scalp up to it instead. Yeah, back in those days, you got the oily end of the dipstick all the time.

But now you’re bigger. Like, a lot bigger. You got tall. You wear thick slabs of prosperity around your midsection like a championship belt. And you’ve forgotten what it’s like to be the little guy in a world engineered for big guys. You never even think about it anymore. (OK, sure, you role-play a halfling rogue in your weekly game, but that doesn’t really count.)

Well, the joke is on you henceforth, Jumbo, because the Acer 10.1-inch Atom netbook was built for you in every way but one: The diminutive size. Now you will know the frustration of inconvenient proportions!

Yeah, there are smaller keyboards out there, but this one’s plenty wee to make you feel like an ungainly ogre. Your clumsy megafingers will fumble gracelessly across its compact keyboard! You’ll poke undexterously at the dinky trackpad! You’ll crouch and duck trying to fit your big, fat face in the li’l’ webcam’s field of view! You’ll curse your creator for imprisoning you in such a uselessly oversized body!

The one thing you won’t do, though, is give up on using the thing. So what if it’s a little petite for comfort? Your new Acer netbook is far too nifty a little machine to give up on those grounds. You’ll make do. You’ll figure it out. You’ll get used to it.

And then you’ll finally understand how smaller folks feel all the time.

Source: Woot.com

Comments (0)